SICILIAN
Fedorov,A - Kasimdzhanov,R
[B89]
Russia Cup II, Moscow RUS (08)
Russia Cup II, Moscow RUS
| 1.e4
c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3
Nc6 The so-called "Classical
Sicilian", for lack of a better
name. 6.Bc4 The introduction
to the Sozin / Velimirovic complex.
Other White tries include: 6 Bg5,
the Richter-Rauzer; 6 Be2, which can
lead into the Boleslavsky after 6
... e5, the Classical Dragon after
6 ... g6 or the Scheveningen after
6 ... e6; and the eclectic 6 Be3,
which invites 6 ... Ng4, but otherwise
prepares the move f2-f4. 6...e6
A popular method of sidestepping the
Velimirovic is 6 ... Qb6, favored
for many years by GM John Fedorowicz.
|
|
|

|
| Then
White usually plays 7 Nde2, 7 Nb3
or GM Nick deFirmian's preference,
7 Ndb5. 7.Be3 a6 8.Qe2 The
signal move of the Velimirovic attack.
White aims to castle queenside and
jumpstart his kingside attack with
the spike g2-g4-g5. In the Sozin,
which the young Bobby Fischer was
partial to, White plays 8 O-O with
f2-f4 in mind. 8...Qc7
The main line so far. An interesting
attempt to dispense with the queen
move, by creating d-file congestion,
is the immediate 8 ... Na5 (in our
game, Kasimdhanov will play this on
move 9), as played in Yudasin - Garcia
Ilundain, Pamplona 1992. Then 9.Bd3
Be7 (9...b5 10.b4! Nb7 11 O-O was
very good for White in Mestrovic -
Polugaevsky, Varna 1972; better in
this line is the offering 10 ... Nc4,
but after 11.Bxc4 bxc4 12.a3! Bb7
13.Bg5, White will again castle kingside
with the more active game) 10.0-0-0
0-0?! (Yudasin gives 10...b5 11.g4
b4 12.Na4 perhaps better is 12 Nb1,
analogous to the game Hernandez -
Adla below] Bd7 13.g5 Ng8 14.b3 as
nice for White, which is true, except
that I do not see why Black cannot
play 13 ... Bxa4 14 gxf6 Bxf6) 11.g4
b5 12.g5 Nd7 13.f4. By comparison
to Fedorov - Kasimdhanov, this was
good for White, as he has not needed
to play the cautionary a2-a3. For
example, here 13 ... b4 (Ilundain
actually continued 13 ... Nc5!?) would
be met by 14.Na4 Nc5 15.Nxc5 dxc5
16.Nb3 and White's kingside pawn storm
will come with great effect. 9.0-0-0
|
|
|
| White
played the un-Velimirovic-like 9 f4
in Conquest - Tukmakov, Iraklion,
1992. After 9 ... Be7 (not so good
is the fork trick 9...Nxe4 10.Nxe4
d5 11.Bd3 dxe4 12.Bxe4 Nxd4 13.Bxd4
Qxf4 14.Be5!) 10.0-0 O-O 11.a4!? Nxd4
12.Bxd4 e5 13.Be3 Be6!, White's mix
of systems has allowed Black to achieve
easy equality. 9...Na5
The main line is 9 ... Be7 10 Bb3
(on 10 Rhg1 O-O 11 g4, the fork trick
11 ... Nxe4 12 Nxe4 d5 usefully disrupts
White's attack) and only then 10 ...
Na5, when the exchange of the knight
is assured.
|
|
|

|
|
One of the points of 9 ... Na5 instead,
is that if White now plays 10 Bb3
looking to transpose to the usual
lines, then Black has 10 ... b5 11
g4 Nxb3+ 12 cxb3 Bb7, and the quick
hit on e4 forces White to waste time
with 13 f3. 10.Bd3 b5 11.a3
Reasonable, although White has a couple
of interesting alternatives here.
11 Bg5, a prelude to a piece sacrifice,
was tried in Milu - Nevednichy, Bucharest
1994. Play continued 11 ... b4 (although
in Rublevsky - Salov, Oviedo 1992,
Black did not want any part of this
and varied with 11 ... Be7 12.a3 Bd7
13.f4 Nc4 14.Rhf1 Rc8 with a complicated
battle in store) 12.Nd5 exd5 13.exd5+
Be7 14.Bxf6 gxf6 15.Rhe1 Ra7 16.Qh5
Qc5 ANALYSIS DIAGRAM and now White
took a misstep with 17.Qh6 (Stoica
gives 17.Bf5! Rc7 18.Re2 (not 18 Bxc8?
b3!) as good for White) and went down
in flames after 17...Qxd5 18.Qxf6
Rg8 19.Bf5 Be6! 20.Nxe6 Qxd1+ 21.Kxd1
Bxf6 0-1. Less impressive in my view
is to let Black get the move ... b5-b4
in unhindered. An example is Hernandez
- Adla, Capablanca Mem B 1992 which
saw 11 g4 b4 12.Nb1 Bb7 13.Nd2 d5
14.f3 Be7 15.Kb1 0-0 16.g5 Nd7 17.h4
Nc5 and Black seems to be ok.
11...Bb7 12.g4 Rc8 Very amusing
was Nunn - Sosonko, Thessaloniki,
1984, wherein Sosonko reacted thematically
to White's flank attack (g2-g4) with
the central blow ... d6-d5, which
also acts against g4-g5 because of
the pressure applied to the e4 square.
However, Black is not well enough
developed for this action, and got
blown away after 12 ... d5 13.exd5
Nxd5 14.Ndxb5! axb5 15.Bxb5+ Kd8 16.Nxd5
exd5 17.Rd3 Nc4 18.Rc3 Bb4 19.Rxc4
dxc4 20.Rd1+ Kc8 21.Rd4 Bd5 22.Rxd5
Bd6 23.Rd4. Judging when ... d6-d5
is good is one of the central questions
in Sicilian middlegames.
13.g5 Nd7
|
|
|
|
14.Rhe1 14 f4 was
first played in Hawelko - Inkiov,
Warsaw 1987. The critical continuation
was 14 ... Nc4! 15.Ndxb5 axb5 16.Nxb5
Qb8 17.Bxc4 Bxe4 18.Rhe1 d5 19.Bd3
Bxd3 20.Qxd3 Be7. After 21.f5 (here
Wolff - Inkiov, Saint John, 1988 saw
21.Nd4 0-0 22.f5 Ne5 23.Qb5 Qc7 24.Bf4
with the better game for White, but
an obvious improvement in this line
is 22 ... Nc5 23 Qb5 Qa8 and Black
may develop a strong counterattack)
Ne5 22.Qb3 Nc4 23.fxe6 fxe6 24.Kb1
0-0 25.Bc1 Rc6 26.a4 Rf2 Black obtained
a very serious initiative for the
pawn, which he soon converted into
a winning attack.
|
|
|

|
|
Fedorov's move, on the other hand,
requires Black to use his second knight
if he wants to get a knight to c4,
and this may cost valuable time. 14...Be7
The next test of this line for Black
should certainly involve either 14
... Ne5 or 14 ... Nb6. 15.Qh5
g6 White's fifteenth was
an irritating exploratory mission.
The threat was 16 Nxe6, and if 15
... O-O?, then 16 Nxe6!! fxe6 17 e5
breaks open the path to h7. The conclusion
could be 17 ... g6 18 Bxg6 hxg6 19
Qxg6+ Kh8 20 Rd4. 16.Qh6 Ne5
Quite double-edged, but worth considering,
was 16 ... Bf8 17 Qh3 Nc5 18 Kb1,
although Black has to watch out for
potential sacrifices on both e6 and
b5. The text move cedes kingside turf
in order to generate queenside threats.
17.Qg7 Rf8 18.f4 I like the
standard precautionary move 18 Kb1!,
as it is hard for Black to strengthen
his position. For example, he dare
not play 18 ... Kd7?? because of 19
Ndxb5! axb5 20 Qxe5, because 20 ...
dxe5 21 Bxb5 is mate! 18...Nec4
19.Bxc4 Nxc4
20.Rd3
|
|
|
| 20...e5
Kasimdhanov chooses an active defensive
plan. It was possible to play positionally
with 20 ... Nxe3 followed by 21 ...
Qb6, to finally achieve the ... b5-b4
advance, although White's much greater
activity and possibilities of mounting
an attack on the central files outweigh
Black's two bishops against two knights.
21.Nf3 f5 Trying
to break down White's grip on the
central light squares, while establishing
a defensive link along the second
rank. On 21 ... Nxe3 22 Rdxe3 exf4
23 R3e2, White stands ready to break
open the king file with Nc3-d5.
|
|
|

|
| 22.Qxh7
Initiating wild complications. Fedorov
was unable to admit that Black stands
better by bailing out with 22 gxf6
(the only move to stop the cave-in
on the light squares)Bxf6 23 Qxc7
Rxc7. 22...fxe4 23.Qxg6+ Kd8
24.Nxe4 Nxb2 It was time
to be materialistic with 24 ... Nxe3!
Then after 25 Rc3 Nc4 26 b3 (better
than 26 fxe5? Rxf3! 27 Rxf3 Nxe5,
or 26 Nxe5 Bxe4! followed by capturing
on e5), the position is wildly unclear,
although it seems that Black must
be in the driver's seat. Temporarily
a piece up, he can follow up with
26 ... Rxf4 or 26 ... d5. 25.Rxd6+
Now 25 Rc3 was impossible, as 25 ...
Bxe4, chopping off its Defense, would
win. But with the text Fedorov enables
his queen to finally cover the c2
square! 25...Bxd6 26.Nxd6
White is down the exchange, but Black
must give it back, as now 26 ... Rb8
27 Nxe5 would be hopeless. 26...Bxf3
27.Nxc8 Kxc8 28.Kxb2 exf4
29.Bb6
|
|
|
| 29...Qd7
Material is almost even, but the deciding
factor is the wide-open position of
Black's king. There would be no point
to 29 ... Qc6 30 Re6. 30.Bc5
Rf7 31.Qg8+ Kb7 32.Re8 Rg7 33.Qf8
Rf7 34.Qh8 Rg7 Or 34 ...
Rh7 35 Rb8+ Kc6 36 Qe5. 35.g6
Bg4 36.Rb8+ Kc6 37.Qf8
|
|
|

|
|
|
| There
is nothing to be done about Rb8-b6+.
|
| 1-0 |
|
|
|