|

|
SICILIAN
Lewis Eisen - Michael
Rohde [B48]
Action - July 22nd
[Rohde]
| Not
having played for a while, I jumped
into the "action" event
at the Marshall Chess Club in New
York City on July 22 and immediately
became embroiled in a messy position
against the talented master Lewis
Eisen. I provoked this by embarking
on a dubious excursion to win Eisen's
b-pawn which allowed him multiple
chances for a sustained attack. Eisen
overprepared his attacking plans and
gave me just enough time to recover.
... 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4
cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 The Taimanov
Variation of the Sicilian Defense.
|
|
|

|
|
5.Nc3 Qc7 A move-order
finesse which avoids the line [5...a6
6.Nxc6 bxc6 7.Bd3 a favorite line
of GM Gyula Sax, which I also think
is pleasant for White. After the text,
6 Ndb5 is no problem as after 6 ...
Qb8, the knight will be removed from
b5 with no harm done. ] 6.Be3
a6 [6...Nf6 is playable as
again 7.Ndb5 Qb8 (but note - had White
played 6 g3, then 6 ... Nf6? 7 Ndb5!
and Bc1-f4 is on the way); however
6 ... Nf6 invites 7 f4 obligating
7 ... d6 with a slow type of Scheveningen
for Black. ] 7.Bd3
A line popularized by Kasparov. 7
f4 b5 with quick queenside play has
proven to be reliable for Black. But
the key point about 7 Bd3 is to take
advantage of the early posting of
the Black queen on c7 which removes
d-file influence. If instead Black
had played ... Ng8-f6 rather than
... Qd8-c7, then a quick ... d7-d5
would now be in order. 7...Nf6
8.0-0 Ne5 A little trick
to get the bishop to c5. Not 8 ...
Bc5? right away due to 9 Nxe6! And
on 8 ... d6, Black has allowed himself
to be tricked into a Scheveningen
where White has gotten his bishop
from f1 to d3 in one move (rather
than the Classical Scheveningen where
White plays Bf1-e2 on his sixth move,
and later re-positions it to d3).
After the text, Black threatens ...
Ne5-g4. 9.h3
Bc5
|
|
|
| 10.Qe2
[The main line is 10.Kh1 d6 11.f4
Ned7 (and then possibly 12 Qf3 b5,
Tal - Najdorf, Belgrade 1970) - not
11 ... Nc6, which got splattered in
the game Kasparov - Anand, Tilburg,
1991 after 12 e5!! [A comparable situation,
in which White ignores a piece on
d4 in order to get in the push e4-e5
arises after 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4
cd 4 Nd4 e6 5 Nc3 a6 6 g3 Qc7 7 Bg2
Nf6 8 0-0 h6 9 Re1 Nd4 10 e5!, as
in DeFirmian - Rohde, New York Open
1988.] Nxe5 [A tough move to play,
as it temporarily sacs a piece while
leaving White with options as to how
to throw it back.
|
|
|

|
|
But Anand clearly saw the alternatives
were demoralizing: 12 ... dxe5 13
Ndb5! axb5 14 Bxc5 Nd4 15 fxe5 Qxc5
16 exf6 0-0 17 Ne4 Qe5 18 Qg4 is grisly;
12 ... Nxd4 13 exf6 gxf6 14 Ne4 f5
15 Bxd4! Bxd4 16 Bb5+ axb5 17 Qxd4
0-0 18 Nf6+ Kh8 19 Ne8+ wins; 12 ...
Bxd4 13 Bxd4 and now 13 ... Nxd4 14
exf6 gxf6 15 f5! or 13 ... dxe5 14
fxe5 Nd7 15 Ne4! with the amusing
triad 15 ... Ndxe5 16 Bc5 and 17 Nd6+
is unstoppable, 15 ... Nxd4 16 Nd6+
wins - if 16 ... Ke7 or 16 ... Kf8
then 17 Rf7+ and 18 Qg4, or 16 ...
Kd8 17 Nxf7+, and 15 ... Ncxe5 16
Qh5 with a continuing attack: 16 ...
0-0? 17 Bxe5 followed by 18 Nf6+,
or 16 ... H6 17 Ng5 0-0 18 Bh7+! Kh8
19 Nxf7+ Rxf7 20 Rxf7 Kxh7 21 Raf1!
threatening 22 Rxg7+ and if 21 ...
Nxf7 22 Rxf7 e5 23 Qf5+.] 13 fe de
14 Bb5+! [Much better than 14 Ndb5?
axb5 15 Nxb5 Qb6 which is not special.]
ab [Black cannot delay the recovery
of the piece. If 14 ... Bd7 15 Bxd7+
Nxd7 16 Nxe6! fxe6 17 Bg5 and Black's
king is cut off, e.g. 17 ... Nb6 18
Ne4, or 17 ... Be7 18 Bxe7 Kxe7 19
Qh5. On 14 ... Kf8 15 Rf6 hurts: 15
... gxf6 16 Bh6+ Ke7 17 Nf5+! wins,
or 15 ... exd4 16 Bf4 Qe7 (16 ...
Bd6 17 Nd5 Qd8 18 Bxd6+ Qxd6 19 Qh5!)
17 Ne4 axb5 18 Be5 (Kasparov) with
a crushing bind - if 18 ... b6 19
Qg4 Bb7 20 Raf1. On 14 ... Ke7 15
Rxf6! wins - 15 ... gxf6 16 Nf5+,
15 ... Kxf6 16 Qg4, or 15 ... exd4
16 Bf4 Qa5 (16 ... Bd6 17 Nd5+) 17
Qh5.] 15 Ndb5 Qb6 16 Bc5 Qc5 17 Nd6+
Ke7 18 Rf6! [Only this thematic shot
retains the attack.] gf 19 Nce4 Qd4
[Not 19 ... Qe3? 20 Nf5+!] 20 Qh5
Rf8 21 Rd1 [Better than 21 Qh4 Ra6
22 Nc8+ Kd7!] Qe3 22 Qh4 Qf4 23 Qe1!
[A pretty switch. Now 23 ... f5 24
Qb4 is devastating.] Ra4 24 Qc3 Rd4
25 Rd4 Qf1+ [Necessary. Not 25 ...
ed 26 Qc7+ Bd7 27 27 Nc8+.] 26 Kh2
ed 27 Qc5 Kd7 28 Nb5 Qf4+ 29 g3 [29
... Qe5 30 Nf6+! Qf6 31 Qc7+ Ke8 and
mate is delivered on the key d6 square.]
1 - 0 ] 10...d6 11.f4 In
a previous action tournament, Eisen
had played the quiet 11 Nb3 against
me. 11...Nc6 Black's
bizarre maneuver has accomplished
the positionally useful trade of dark-squared
bishops. Other moves unnecessarily
leave the d4 knight unmarked. 12.Nf3
Bxe3+ [12...Nh5 misses the
mark because of the simple 13.Kh2]
13.Qxe3 Nd7 Quite an important
precaution. [13...0-0 looked unsavory
due to 14.e5 dxe5 15.fxe5 Nd7 16.Bxh7+
with a quick attack against the king.
] 14.Kh1 [Also reasonable
was 14.a4 Qb6 15.Qxb6 Nxb6 where White
has a spatial edge, but Black's king
will be both comfortable and useful
on e7.] 14...Qb6
A strange "double attack",
both hitting the b-pawn and offering
the queen trade which White has already
announced, with Kg1-h1, that he is
not interested in. Alternatives were
14 ... b5 and 14 ... O-O. 15.Qe2
Qxb2 I was in a "show
me" kind of mood. 16.Nd5
|
|
|
| 16...0-0
I played this nonchalant retort fairly
quickly. However, because an attack
is brewing in all cases, it would
have been better to analyze [16...exd5
17.exd5+ Ne7 18.Rae1 Qf6 19.g4! (if
19 Ng5 Kd8! 20 Ne4!? Qh6 holds) when
19 ... h6? loses to 20 g5! anyway,
so Black should play 19 ... O-O 20
g5 (the position is about equal on
20 Qxe7 Qxe7 21 Rxe7 Nc5) Qxf4 21
Qxe7, when 21 ... Nc5? loses to 22
Bxh7+! Kxh7 23 Qxf8 and if 23 ...
Bxh3 then 24 g6+!, but instead Black
can play 21 ... g6! with an unclear
position. ]
|
|
|

|
| 17.Rfb1
Played hastily. There was no reason
to use the f-rook for this job. Correct
was: [17.Rab1 Qa3 (definitely not
(17...Qxa2? 18.Ra1 Qb2 19.Rfb1) 18.e5!!
with a strong-looking attack although
White has to invest in it heavily
after 18 ... exd5 19 Bxh7+!! Kh8 (better
than 19 ... Kxh7 20 Ng5+ Kh6 - 20
... Kg8 21 Qh5 - 21 Qf2!) 20 Ng5 g6
and then 21 Qg4! is very dangerous.
] 17...Qa3 18.Rb3
Still 18 e5! was the right way. 18...Qa5
19.Ne3 Now I was not so worried
about 19 e5 due to 19 ... g6! and
if 20 Nf6+ Nxf6 21 exf6 Qd8 picks
off the f-pawn. 19...Nc5
Rushing to get rid of that horrible
light-squared bishop. 20.e5
On other moves White is getting pushed
back too much. 20...Nxd3
I wanted no part of 20 ... Nxb3 21
Bxh7+ Kh8 (White's attack is also
too explosive after 21 ... Kxh7 22
Ng5+) 22 Ng5 g6 23 Qg4 Kg7 24 Qh4
and the extra attacking piece - the
White knight on e3 - will arrive on
g4. 21.Rxd3 dxe5 22.Nc4 Qc5
To be considered was 22 ... Qc7. It
has the advantage of assisting the
Black bishop in getting out of the
starting gate, but has the disadvantage
that no pressure is placed on the
White knight on c4. Play would continue
23 fxe5 Bd7 24 Nd6 Ne7 and White still
has compensation for the pawn. 23.Ncxe5
Nb4
|
|
|
| Figuring
that my knight was more useful. Black
would have trouble developing after
23 ... Nxe5 24 Nxe5 Qc7 Rad1. 24 Rd2
Nd5 24.Ng5! A very
good move to confuse the issue. 24...f6
On 25 ... Nxf4 26 Qe4 Ng6 27 Nxg6
Qxg5! 28 Nxf8 Qxd2 should be good
for Black, but during the game I could
not tell. 25.Nxh7
Again Eisen poses the maximum problems.
25...Kxh7 Allowing
White's queen and other knight to
take up strong positions, but in lines
where I was winning two pieces for
a rook, such as 26 ... fxe5 27 Nxf8,
I did not know if I was better. 26.Qh5+
Kg8 27.Ng6 White is a piece
down and there is no immediate perpetual
in sight, but it is very difficult
to get of White's menacing pieces.
27...Bd7 28.Re1 Rfc8??
Clearly indicated was 29 ... Rfe8.
Then White can create a discovery
with 30 Qh8+ Kf7 31 Qh5, and Black
does not seem to be making progress.
29.Rd5 exd5 30.Re7
White is getting his material back
with interest. 30...Qxe7 31.Nxe7+
Kf8 32.Nxc8 Rxc8 33.Qxd5 Bc6
Establishing an easy fortress on the
queenside, with rook and bishop against
queen, and everything mutually protected.
34.Qd2 Re8 35.Kh2
Eisen graciously offered a draw here,
with both of our clocks down to the
sudden death wire. White has some
winning chances based on the march
of his h-pawn which may undermine
Black's own kingside pawn formation
|
| 1/2-1/2 |
|
|
|
|
|