SICILIAN
Lugo - Gurevich,D [B56]
Chicago Open Chicago, Illinois, 05.1996
[Rohde]
| 1.e4
c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3
Nc6 6.Be3 |
|
|

|
| There
are several points to this move. If
6 ... e5, the knight retreats not
to b3, as in the Boleslavsky 6 Be2
e5 7 Nb3, but to f3, as the White
king bishop has not yet moved, and
is headed to c4. If 6 ... e6, White
can head for the Velimirovic with
7 Bc4, having avoided the variation
6 Bc4 Qb6!?. If Black heads for the
dragon with 6 ... g6, White can still
choose between the Yugoslav 7 f3 or
the Classical 7 Be2. In the 1996 World
Open, Zaitsev played the hybrid 6
... a6 against me, and I chose 7 Qd2
heading for the English attack with
f2-f3 and g2-g4.
|
|
|

|
| Then
I was surprised by 7 ... Nxd4, and
after 8 Bxd4 (better is 8 Qxd4 and
if 8 ... e5?! 9 Qb6!) e5 9 Be3 Be6
I settled for the meek 10 Rd1, as
I did not like 10 O-O-O Rc8 11 f3
Qa5 12 a3 Rxc3! 13 Qxc3 Qxc3 14 bxc3
d5. 6...Ng4 7.Bg5
A much-analyzed older line is 7 Bb5
Nxe3 8 fxe3 Bd7 9 Bxc6 bxc6 10 O-O
e6, with Black's two bishops and compact
center fighting off White's lead in
development and pending kingside attack.
With the text White tries to prove
that the knight on g4 is misplaced.
7...Qb6 I think that
White is quite comfortable in the
line 7 ... h6 8 Bh4 g5 9 Bg3 Bg7 10
Nb3 because of Black's weakened kingside.
8.Bb5 Bd7
9.0-0
|
|
|
| A
key move which defends the knight
on d4 - 9 ... Qxd4 (not 9 ... Nxd4?
10 Bxd7+ Kxd7 11 Qxg4+) 10 Bxc6 Qxd1
11 Bxd7+ with a small endgame advantage.
9...h6 10.Be3 I introduced
this move against Dmitry in a tournament
in New York City in 1986. White reverts
to the weak pawns for open f-file
concept. The difference between this
position and the one in the note to
White's 7th is that Black has an extra
two moves (the result of the maneuver
Be3-g5-e3) - ... Qd8-b6 and ... h7-h6
- both moves which will make a successful
kingside Defense harder.
|
|
|

|
|
10...Nxe3 11.fxe3 g6
Is this the big improvement on Rohde
- Gurevich, NY 1986, which continued
11 ... e6 12.Bxc6 bxc6 13.Qf3 f6 14.Qh5+
Ke7 with an unclear position? 12.Nd5
Qd8 13.Bxc6 bxc6 14.Qf3 f6
|
|
|
| Also
very strange is 14 ... Rh7! 15 e5
(15 Nf4 e5 16 Nfe6 - not good enough
is 16 Nxg6 exd4 17 Nxf8 Kxf8 - Bxe6
17 Nxe6 Qe7, and Black is out of trouble)
cxd5 16 e6 Bxe6 17 Nxe6 fxe6 18 Qxf8+
Kd7. 15.Nf4 Kf7
|
|
|

|
| This
is what Gurevich has been playing
for. Now, with the threat of ... e7-e5,
he is hoping to make both knights
back off. Of course, Lugo will have
none of that. 16.Qe2 Qc8
Extra support for e6 is needed. 17.Rf3
It seems to me that 17 Qc4+ e6 18
Nd3! was strong, threatening the push
e4-e5, and if 18 ... d5 19 Qc3 eyes
all kinds of weak dark squares.
17...e5 18.Qc4+ d5 19.Nxd5
No good is 19 exd5 because Black will
munch on a knight, after which 20
dxc6+ Be6 accomplishes nothing. 19...cxd5
20.Qxd5+ Ke8
|
|
|

|
| One
of Lugo's points is that White crashes
through on 20 ... Kg7 21 Rxf6! But
Gurevich's move forces White to toss
another knight if he wants to break
down the f-file. 21.Rxf6 exd4
22.Raf1 Be7 23.Rxg6 Kd8 It
turns out that the only material White
can garnish with his initiative is
a couple of loose pawns. 24.exd4
Rb8 25.Qe5 Re8
26.Rxh6 Rb5 27.Qg3 Rg5 28.Qf4
Rg4 29.Qd2 Bg5 30.Qa5+ Qc7 31.Qxc7+
Kxc7 32.Rh3 Rgxe4 33.Rc3+ Kb8
|
|
|

|
|